《小句級階上概念語法隱喻的功能-認知研究》是2016年07月科學出版社出版的圖書，作者是趙莉。
基本介紹
- 中文名：小句級階上概念語法隱喻的功能-認知研究
- 作者：趙莉
- 出版社：科學出版社
- 出版時間：2016年7月
- 定價：78 元
- 開本：B5
- 裝幀：平裝
- ISBN：9787030490568
內容簡介,圖書目錄,
內容簡介
該書以隱喻式小句為切入點考察小句級階上的概念語法隱喻現象，將“構式”、“整合”、“意象圖式”和“識解”四個理論因子融合為整體建構起一個框架，在此框架內分析了隱喻式物質、關係和心理小句動態的生成過程、經驗基礎、認知動因及語義和語法特徵。本書具有以下特點：第一，該書將概念語法隱喻研究從傳統的詞組、短語級階拓展到了小句級階；第二，該書採取了功能和認知整合的研究視角；第三，該書實現了描寫和解釋的結合、建構理論模型和分析語言事實的結合。
圖書目錄
Contents
叢書序 i
前言 v
Preface xi
Chapter OneIntroduction 1
1.1 Research Topic and Aims 2
1.2Research Rationale 5
1.2.1 IGM at the rank of clause 6
1.2.2A functional-cognitive perspective 7
1.3Data and Methodology 9
1.4Organization of the Book 12
Chapter Two A Review on Metaphor Literature 14
2.1Traditional Treatment of Metaphor 14
2.1.1Comparison Theory 15
2.1.2Substitution Theory 16
2.1.3Interaction Theory 19
2.2Cognitive Linguistic Approaches to Metaphor 23
2.2.1 Lakoff and Johnson’s CMT 23
2.2.2Fauconnier and Turner’sCBT 26
2.2.3Grady’s Primary Metaphor Theory 30
2.3 SFL’s Work on Grammatical Metaphor 32
2.3.1Halliday and Matthiessen’s seminal study on GM 33
2.3.2Ravelli’s refinement of IGM model 43
2.3.3 Holme’s treatment of GM as a cognitive construct 46
2.3.4Fawcett’s and Thompson’s insights into GM 47
2.4Contributions and Inadequacies of Previous Metaphor Studies 49
Chapter Three An Analytical Model of Metaphorical Clauses 53
3.1 Theoretical Elements in the Analytical Model 53
3.1.1Construction 54
3.1.2Blending 56
3.1.3Image schema 59
3.1.4Construal 61
3.2The Analytical Model 63
3.2.1Hypothesis of metaphorical clause generation 63
3.2.2Principles of extended blending 68
3.2.3Basis and motivations of extended blending 70
3.3 Basic Concepts in the Analytical Mode l72
3.3.1ProcessConstruction 72
3.3.2ProcessMetaphor 77
3.4Classification of Metaphorical Clauses 80
3.5 An Example: Generation of a Metaphorical Clause 81
3.6Summary86 Chapter Four Analysis of Metaphorical Material Clauses 87
4.1Introduction 87
4.2 Analysis of Metaphorical Clauses from Occurring Experience 89
4.2.1 Description of metaphorical clauses from occurring experience 89
4.2.2 Generation of metaphorical clauses from occurring experience 93
4.2.3Experiential basis: OCCURRENCE Schema 96
4.2.4 Motivations of metaphorical clauses from occurring experience 98
4.2.5Characteristics of metaphorical clauses from occurring experience 107
4.3 Analysis of Metaphorical Clauses from Moving Experience 110
4.3.1 Description of metaphorical clauses from moving experience 110
4.3.2 Generation of metaphorical clauses from moving experience 114
4.3.3Experiential basis: MOTION schema 116
4.3.4Motivations of metaphorical clauses from moving 118
4.4 Metaphorical Clauses from Manipulating Experience 123
4.4.1 Description of metaphorical clauses from manipulating experience 123
4.4.2 Generation of metaphorical clauses from manipulating experience 128
4.4.3Experiential basis: FORCE schema 130
4.4.4Motivations of metaphorical clauses from manipulating 131
4.4.5 Characteristics of metaphorical clauses from manipulating experience 137
4.5 Analysis of Metaphorical Clauses from Transferring Experience 140
4.5.1 Description of metaphorical clauses from transferring experience 140
4.5.2 Generation of metaphorical clauses from transferring experience 143
4.5.3Experiential basis: TRANSFER schema 146
4.5.4 Motivations of metaphorical clauses from transferring experience 148
4.5.5 Characteristics of metaphorical clauses from transferring experience 158
4.6Summary 161 Chapter Five Analysis of Metaphorical Relational Clauses 163
5.1Introduction 163
5.2 Analysis of Metaphorical Circumstantial Clauses 166
5.2.1Description of metaphorical circumstantial clauses 166
5.2.2 Dynamic generation of metaphorical circumstantial clauses170
5.2.3Experiential basis: CONTAINMENT schema 173
5.2.4Motivations of metaphorical circumstantial clauses 175
5.2.5Characteristics of metaphorical circumstantial clauses 185
5.3 Analysis of Metaphorical Possessive Clauses 188
5.3.1Description of metaphorical possessive clauses 188
5.3.2 Dynamic generation of metaphorical possessive clauses 193
5.3.3Experiential basis: POSSESSION schema 195
5.3.4Motivations of metaphorical possessive clauses 198
5.3.5Characteristics of metaphorical possessive clauses 211
5.4Summary 214 Chapter Six Analysis of Metaphorical Mental Clauses 216
6.1Introduction 216
6.2 Description of Metaphorical Mental Clauses 221
6.3 Dynamic Generation of Metaphorical Mental Clauses 227
6.4 Experiential Basis: PATH Schema 230
6.5 Motivation of Metaphorical Mental Clauses: Directionality 231
6.6 Characteristics of Metaphorical Mental Clauses 236
6.7 Metaphorical Clauses and Semantic Junction 240
6.8Summary 242 Chapter Seven Conclusion 244
7.1 Major Findings and Contributions of the Present Research 244
7.2 Limitations and Implications for Further Research 246
7.3Summary 247 Bibliography249 Appendix 260
List of Figures
Figure 1.1 CL’s, the book’s and SFL’s view of experience, cognition and language 9
Figure 2.1 Semantic junction of length and motion (Halliday, 2007/1999: xxiv) 35
Figure 3.1 The representation of the Ditransitive Construction (Goldberg, 1995: 50) 56
Figure 3.2 An integration network (Adapted from Fauconnier and Turner, 2002: 46) 57
Figure 3.3 The blending operation underlying the generation of metaphorical clauses 66
Figure 3.4The iconic representation of Process Construction75
Figure 3.5 A systemic network of Figure 77
Figure 3.6Typical realization of four types of figures 77
Figure 3.7The yin-yang picture of ‘process and figure’ 78
Figure 3.8 Clauses as instantiations of ProcessConstructions 79
Figure 3.9 The blending operation underlying the generation of (10) 82
Figure 3.10 Thecontrastive representation of semantic structuresof (10) and(10') 84
Figure 3.11Change of semantic structure from (10') to (10) 85
Figure 4.1The Material Process Construction 88
Figure 4.2 The blending operation underlying the generation of (14) 94
Figure 4.3The OCCURRENCE image schema 97
Figure 4.4The iconic representation of (21) 100
Figure 4.5The iconic representation in (23) 102
Figure 4.6The iconic representation in (25) 104
Figure 4.7The iconic representation in (27) 106
Figure 4.8 The semantic structure of he was angry 108
Figure 4.9The semantic structure in (28) 108
Figure 4.10Change of semantic structures from (28') to (28) 109
Figure 4.11The dynamic generation in (54) 115
Figure 4.12 The sub MOTION image schema (R-Object conflating with Goal) 117
Figure 4.13The sub MOTION image schema (R-Object conflating with Source)118
Figure 4.14 The iconic representation in(55) 119
Figure 4.15The iconicrepresentation in (59) 122
Figure 4.16The blending operation in (97) 129
Figure 4.17 The FORCE image schema (Modified from Evans & Green, 2006: 188) 131
Figure 4.18The iconicrepresentation in (98) 132
Figure 4.19The iconicrepresentation in (104) 137
Figure 4.20The semantic structure in (106') 138
Figure 4.21The semantic structure in (106) 138
Figure 4.22Change of semantic structures from (106') to (106) 139
Figure 4.23The blending operation in (118) 144
Figure 4.24 The TRANSFER image schema 147
Figure 4.25The iconicrepresentation in (122) 151
Figure 4.26The iconicrepresentation in(122')151
Figure 4.27The energy flow in (122') 152
Figure 4.28 The energy flow in (122) (Newman, 1996: 50) 152
Figure 4.29The iconicrepresentation in (126) 154
Figure 4.30The iconicrepresentation in (128) 155
Figure 4.31The iconic schema in (129) 157
Figure 4.32The iconic schema in (129') 157
Figure 4.33The semantic structure in (130') 159
Figure 4.34The semantic structures in (130) 159
Figure 4.35Change of semantic structures from (129') to (129) 160
Figure 5.1The Relational process construction 164
Figure 5.2The blending operation underlying (20) 171
Figure 5.3The CONTAINMENT image schema 174
Figure 5.4The iconic representation in (21) 178
Figure 5.5The iconic representation in (27) 180
Figure 5.6The contrastive representation of Clauses (35) and (35') 182
Figure 5.7 The contrastive aspectual representation of clauses (35) and (35') 183
Figure 5.8The semantic structure in (38') 186
Figure 5.9The semantic structure of clause (38) 186
Figure 5.10Change of semantic structures from (38') to (38)187
Figure 5.11 The blending operation underlying a terrible fear possessed him in (55) 193
Figure 5.12 The inalienable POSSESSION image schema 196
Figure 5.13The alienablePOSSESSION image schema 197
Figure 5.14The pictorial representation in (63) 200
Figure 5.15The pictorial representation in (65) 202
Figure 5.16 The contrastive representation of clauses (67') and (67) 205
Figure 5.17The pictorialcontrast of ‘profiling’ in (71) and (71') 208
Figure 5.18The pictorial representation in (72') 209
Figure 5.19The pictorial representation in (72) 210
Figure 5.20The semantic structure in (82') 212
Figure 5.21The semantic structure in (82) 212
Figure 5.22Change of semantic structures from (82') to (82) 213
Figure 6.1The Canonical Event Model (Langacker, 1991: 285) 218
Figure 6.2The Mental Event Model 219
Figure 6.3The Mental Process Construction 221
Figure 6.4 The blending operation underlying the generation of (18) 228
Figure 6.5 The PATH image schema (adapted from Johnson, 1987: 114) 231
Figure 6.6The iconic representation in (19) 235
Figure 6.7The semantic structure of (22') 237
Figure 6.8The semantic structure of (22) 238
Figure 6.9 Change of semantic structures from (22') to (22) 239
Figure 6.10Semanticjunction of (23) 241
List of Tables
Table 3.1 The grammatical structure of (10) and (10') 86
Table 4.1 Grammatical structures of (28) and (28') 110
Table 4.2 Nouns as Actor in metaphorical clauses from object-manipulating experience 128
Table 4.3 Grammatical structures of (106) and (106') 139
Table 4.4 The grammatical structures of (130) and (130') 160
Table 5.1 The grammatical structures of (38) and (38') 188
Table 5.2 The grammatical structure of (82) and (82') 213
Table 6.1 The grammatical structure of (22) and (22') 239
