國內外學者對於赫伊津哈的關注主要集中於史學理論和史學史角度，對於赫伊津哈關於各時代文明具體觀點和整體文明史觀的論述則較為缺乏。筆者主要從文明史而非史學史的角度論述赫伊津哈眼中整體文明歷史變遷的圖景。
基本介紹
- 中文名：赫伊津哈文明史觀研究
- 類別：論文
- 摘要：約翰·赫伊津哈
- 關鍵字：文明史觀
中文摘要,外文摘要,
中文摘要
約翰·赫伊津哈是享譽世界的現代荷蘭歷史學家，也是現代文化史的開創者之一。國內外學者對於赫伊津哈的關注主要集中於史學理論和史學史角度，對於赫伊津哈關於各時代文明具體觀點和整體文明史觀的論述則較為缺乏。筆者主要從文明史而非史學史的角度論述赫伊津哈眼中整體文明歷史變遷的圖景。
全文共由導論、六章、結語、附錄總計九個部分組成。
導論主要闡述選題的意義、國內外研究狀況和本文的寫作思路。
第一章主要闡述赫伊津哈文明史觀產生的背景，包括歷史背景和赫伊津哈個人的生平與經歷兩個方面。
第二章主要闡述他的晚期中世紀文明觀。筆者先以騎士精神為切入點，然後分別從宗教、思想與文學、藝術兩方面闡述赫伊津哈眼中的晚期中世紀文明，探討赫伊津哈以宗教生活圖像一體化的象徵體系作為趨於結束的中世紀文明主要特徵的觀點。
第三章主要闡述赫伊津哈的文藝復興觀念。文中論述赫伊津哈眼中文藝復興觀念的演變史，對赫伊津哈的中世紀精神本位說與布克哈特的文藝復興優先觀念進行了對比研究；並闡明了在基本的歷史哲學視野中，赫伊津哈是一位歷史共時性與歷時性並重的史家。
第四章主要闡述赫伊津哈的近現代文明觀。文中先論述赫伊津哈對於其祖國——荷蘭文明的觀點：他認為荷蘭文明是一種交流與中介的文明，並藉此闡明赫伊津哈的多元文化立場。然後再論述赫伊津哈的美國文明觀，探討了赫伊津哈關於美國文明的中心理論——機械化學說，並進而引申出赫伊津哈對於現代文明的整體思考。
第五章主要闡述赫伊津哈對於整體現代文明的文化反思。文中論述了赫伊津哈的理性主義本位立場：由於真正理性精神的缺失，科學思維與反智主義這一對看似矛盾的觀念並存於現代人的精神結構中，這對孿生子大行其道並造成了嚴重後果。
第六章主要闡述赫伊津哈總結性的理論思考：遊戲說。筆者闡述了赫伊津哈的遊戲觀念，並闡明“遊戲說”已經被赫伊津哈構造成了一種獨立、完整的本體論；並進一步探討赫伊津哈以“遊戲說”來貫穿羅馬——中世紀——近現代整體文明發展的歷史哲學嘗試和“文明即遊戲”的觀點。
結語部分回顧、總結了赫伊津哈文明史觀的特點，並點明了赫伊津哈在現代西方思想家譜系中的地位。
關鍵字：赫伊津哈 文明史觀 文化活力 綜合性人文思想家
第四章主要闡述赫伊津哈的近現代文明觀。文中先論述赫伊津哈對於其祖國——荷蘭文明的觀點：他認為荷蘭文明是一種交流與中介的文明，並藉此闡明赫伊津哈的多元文化立場。然後再論述赫伊津哈的美國文明觀，探討了赫伊津哈關於美國文明的中心理論——機械化學說，並進而引申出赫伊津哈對於現代文明的整體思考。
第五章主要闡述赫伊津哈對於整體現代文明的文化反思。文中論述了赫伊津哈的理性主義本位立場：由於真正理性精神的缺失，科學思維與反智主義這一對看似矛盾的觀念並存於現代人的精神結構中，這對孿生子大行其道並造成了嚴重後果。
第六章主要闡述赫伊津哈總結性的理論思考：遊戲說。筆者闡述了赫伊津哈的遊戲觀念，並闡明“遊戲說”已經被赫伊津哈構造成了一種獨立、完整的本體論；並進一步探討赫伊津哈以“遊戲說”來貫穿羅馬——中世紀——近現代整體文明發展的歷史哲學嘗試和“文明即遊戲”的觀點。
結語部分回顧、總結了赫伊津哈文明史觀的特點，並點明了赫伊津哈在現代西方思想家譜系中的地位。
關鍵字：赫伊津哈 文明史觀 文化活力 綜合性人文思想家
外文摘要
Johan Huizinga is a modern Dutch historian with a world-famous reputation, and also one of the founders of modern culture history. For the attentions of scholars both at home and abroad about Huizinga is mainly concentrated on the aspects of theory of historiography and history of historiography, but discussions on his concrete ideas of different ages and his concept of whole civilization history are comparatively insufficient. The author attempts to discuss a picture of transitions in the who...>> 詳細
Johan Huizinga is a modern Dutch historian with a world-famous reputation, and also one of the founders of modern culture history. For the attentions of scholars both at home and abroad about Huizinga is mainly concentrated on the aspects of theory of historiography and history of historiography, but discussions on his concrete ideas of different ages and his concept of whole civilization history are comparatively insufficient. The author attempts to discuss a picture of transitions in the whole civilization history mainly from the angle of civilization history rather than history of historiography.
There are nine parts in this dissertation including the introduction, six chapters, the conclusion and the appendix.
In the introduction, the author elaborates the significance of the selected topic, displayed the external and internal research situations and writing ideas of the dissertation.
In the first chapter, the author elaborates the boring background of Huizinga''s concept of civilization history, including two aspects as historic backgrounds and Huizinga''s life and experience.
In the second chapter, the author mainly discusses Huizinga''s concept of late medieval civilization. The author first selects knighthood as an entry point, then elaborates the late medieval civilization in Huizinga''s visions from two aspects of religions and thoughts, literature and art respectively in order to illustrate Huizinga''s perspective which treats the symbol system of religion-life image integration as the main feature of far gone medieval civilization.
In the third chapter, the author mainly discussed Huizinga''s concept of the Renaissance. The author elaborates the variation history of the concept of Renaissance in Huizinga''s eyes and makes a comparative study on Huizinga''s medieval spirit standard said and Burckhardt''s Renaissance prior ideas. Then the author illustrates the idea that Huizinga is a historian who attaches equal importance to synchronicity and diachronism in the basic view of philosophy of history.
In the fourth chapter, the author mainly discusses Huizinga''s concept of modern civilization. The author first elaborates Huizinga''s view about his motherland, the Dutch civilization. Huizinga considers Dutch civilization as a sort of civilization with communication and intermediary characters, and clarifies Huizinga''s standpoint as a multi-cultural thinker. Afterwards the author discusses Huizinga''s concept of American civilization, especially on the theory of mechanization which is Huizinga''s key theory of American civilization, and then prompts Huizinga''s holistic thinking about modern civilization.
In the fifth chapter, the author mainly discusses Huizinga''s cultural introspections about the whole modern civilization. The author elaborates Huizinga''s basic position of rationalism. Due to the lack of real rational spirits, the pair of seemingly contradictory ideas as scientific thinking and anti-intellectualism co-exists in the spiritual structure of modern men.
In the sixth chapter, the author mainly discusses Huizinga''s theoretical thinking in summary, the doctrine of play. The author explains Huizinga''s concepts about play and elaborates that the doctrine of play has been structured into a sort of independent ontology with complete senses. The author further discusses Huizinga''s concept that civilization is just a game and his attempt of philosophy of history which penetrates the whole development of civilization, including Roman civilization, medieval civilization and modern civilization.
In the conclusion, the author reviews and summarizes the characteristics of Huizinga''s concept of civilization history, and points out Huizinga''s status in the pedigree of modern western thinkers.
Key words: Huizinga, concept of civilization history, cultural vitality, comprehensive humanistic thinker
There are nine parts in this dissertation including the introduction, six chapters, the conclusion and the appendix.
In the introduction, the author elaborates the significance of the selected topic, displayed the external and internal research situations and writing ideas of the dissertation.
In the first chapter, the author elaborates the boring background of Huizinga''s concept of civilization history, including two aspects as historic backgrounds and Huizinga''s life and experience.
In the second chapter, the author mainly discusses Huizinga''s concept of late medieval civilization. The author first selects knighthood as an entry point, then elaborates the late medieval civilization in Huizinga''s visions from two aspects of religions and thoughts, literature and art respectively in order to illustrate Huizinga''s perspective which treats the symbol system of religion-life image integration as the main feature of far gone medieval civilization.
In the third chapter, the author mainly discussed Huizinga''s concept of the Renaissance. The author elaborates the variation history of the concept of Renaissance in Huizinga''s eyes and makes a comparative study on Huizinga''s medieval spirit standard said and Burckhardt''s Renaissance prior ideas. Then the author illustrates the idea that Huizinga is a historian who attaches equal importance to synchronicity and diachronism in the basic view of philosophy of history.
In the fourth chapter, the author mainly discusses Huizinga''s concept of modern civilization. The author first elaborates Huizinga''s view about his motherland, the Dutch civilization. Huizinga considers Dutch civilization as a sort of civilization with communication and intermediary characters, and clarifies Huizinga''s standpoint as a multi-cultural thinker. Afterwards the author discusses Huizinga''s concept of American civilization, especially on the theory of mechanization which is Huizinga''s key theory of American civilization, and then prompts Huizinga''s holistic thinking about modern civilization.
In the fifth chapter, the author mainly discusses Huizinga''s cultural introspections about the whole modern civilization. The author elaborates Huizinga''s basic position of rationalism. Due to the lack of real rational spirits, the pair of seemingly contradictory ideas as scientific thinking and anti-intellectualism co-exists in the spiritual structure of modern men.
In the sixth chapter, the author mainly discusses Huizinga''s theoretical thinking in summary, the doctrine of play. The author explains Huizinga''s concepts about play and elaborates that the doctrine of play has been structured into a sort of independent ontology with complete senses. The author further discusses Huizinga''s concept that civilization is just a game and his attempt of philosophy of history which penetrates the whole development of civilization, including Roman civilization, medieval civilization and modern civilization.
In the conclusion, the author reviews and summarizes the characteristics of Huizinga''s concept of civilization history, and points out Huizinga''s status in the pedigree of modern western thinkers.
Key words: Huizinga, concept of civilization history, cultural vitality, comprehensive humanistic thinker
