基本介紹
- 書名：控辯審關係的建構：法官庭審語篇處理的框架分析
- 作者：陳金詩
- ISBN：9787030309297
- 類別：圖書 > 法律 > 法律實務
- 頁數：265
- 出版社：科學出版社
- 出版時間：2011-06-01
- 裝幀：平裝
- 開本：32開
內容簡介,目錄,
內容簡介
控辯審關係是司法實踐的重要內容之一，也是刑事訴訟研究的一個重要課題。此前，從法官的庭審語篇操控入手研究控辯審關係的建構尚屬空白。而法官的裁判權通過庭審互動來實現，法官的語篇處理會影響到庭審中各方關係的建構，因此法官如何通過語篇處理建構合理的控辯審關係成為本研究的關注焦點。
陳金詩編著的《控辯審關係的建構：法官庭審語篇處理的框架分析》涉及框架分析的三個核心內容是：互動性框架、框定和語篇立足點遷移。整個研究主要是對從法律語料庫中抽取的語料進行語篇信息的定性分析。
語料分析表明，法官有時在庭審互動過程中建構出控辯審間的倒三角關係。在操控庭審的過程中，法官的獨白偶爾會具有“控審合作”傾向，違背庭審程式。法庭對話中，法官也會使用有違庭審程式的“有罪推定”語篇信息。而法庭問答內容最為豐富，法官的語篇信息處理不當可能也會導致“有罪推定”、“控審合作”或“控辯不平等對抗”等違背司法公正的後果。這些都不利於維護被告人的訴訟權利。
分析還揭示了在法官的語篇信息處理中影響控辯審關係建構的各種因素，詳述了法官庭審語篇如何遵循或違背了司法公正。分析發現，法官的定位、中立性和對當事人的信任性與程式公正密切相關。法官的目的和動機、個人因素或非個人因素影響著庭審中的分配公正；而懲罰公正的違背主要源於應得懲處、懲處對象、懲處手段以及懲處力度。根據司法公正原則可知，分配公正和懲罰公正的違背最終導致程式公正的破壞。
同時通過比較研究，歸納出法官通過語篇手段重構控辨審關係的框定策略。在語篇立足點遷移的策略分析中，歸納了法官的三種語篇立足點，即“語篇實踐者”、“語篇實踐者+語篇作者”、“語篇實踐者+語篇作者+語篇委託者”。在互動中，信息層次降級、信息層級移位或共享分類修改等語篇手段會引起語篇立足點遷移。在分析再框定的策略時，歸納出了框架緊縮、框架延展和框架合意三種次級策略。框架緊縮主要通過信息單位增補或信息單位合併等手段以實現框架的具體化；框架延展是通過冗餘信息刪除或信息單位融合等手段來完成；框架合意則通過信息點更換、信息單位重複或信息單位共享等手段來實現。在中國法制背景下，這些策略和具體的語篇手段有助於避免控辯審正三角關係重構中的司法不公。
《控辯審關係的建構：法官庭審語篇處理的框架分析》的主要創新點在於基於語篇信息的框架分析解決了控辯審關係的建構問題。語料分析證實了該分析框架的適用性和有效性。本研究提出系統的語篇處理策略和具體的語言實現手段，為司法公正相關課題提供了語言研究視角和研究方法。另外，本研究的分析框架具有綜合性和多維性特徵。它把互動性框架、框定和語篇立足點遷移融為一體，構成了框架分析的三個核心成分。並套用了“法律語篇樹狀信息結構”這一操作性強的分析工具，有效地支持了框架的認定和定性、語篇立足點的分類和遷移、框定過程和策略分析。此外，本研究為與刑事訴訟相關的教學提供了更為豐富的內容，對有志於從事司法工作尤其是從事法官工作的學習者也具有啟發意義。該研究強調保障被告人合法權益、維護程式公正、分配公正和懲罰公正，因此對中國司法改革具有參照作用。
《控辯審關係的建構：法官庭審語篇處理的框架分析》用英文出版，便於向國外推廣，加深國外法律語言學界對中國法律語言的認識。本著作可能尚存不當之處，敬請讀者批評指正。
目錄
序
Acknowledgements
內容簡介
Abstract
Transcription Conventions
Abbreviations
Chapter I Introduction
1.1 Key Concepts
1.1.1 Discourse
1.1.2 Frame
1.1.3 PDJ Relationship
1.2 Research Background
1.2.1 Judges in the Courtroom Interaction
1.2.2 PDJ Relationship in Courtroom
1.3 Rationale
1.3.1 The Status Quo of Research on the Topic
1.3.2 Frame Analysis as a Practicable Approach
1.4 Research Objective and Questions
1.5 Organization of the Book
Chapter 2 Theoretical Framework
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Theoretical Basis
2.2.1 Frame Theory
2.2.2 Discourse Analysis and Frame Analysis
2.3 Conceptual Framework of Frame Analysis
2.3.1 Interactive Frames Activated by Discourse at Multiple Levels
2.3.2 Application of Framing
2.3.3 Footing Shifts in Frame Analysis
2.4 Analytical Framework
2.5 Research Methodology
2.5.1 Data Collection
2.5.2 Data Analysis
Chapter 3 PDJ Relationship Constructed by Judges in Court
3.1 Introduction
3.2 PDJ Relationship Manifested in Monologue
3.2.1 Monologue in Judges‘ Discourse
3.2.2 PDJ Relationship in the Monologic Interactions
3.3 PDJ Relationship Manifested in Dialogue
3.3.1 Dialogue as Judges’ Directive Information
3.3.2 PDJ Relationship in the Dialogic Interactions
3.4 PDJ Relationship Manifested in Questioning
3.4.1 Questioning in Judges‘ Discourse
3.4.2 PDJ Relationship in the Questioning and Answering
3.5 Results and Discussions
3.5.1 Distribution of Discourse Information
3.5.2 Discourse Information Levels
3.5.3 Current PDJ Relationship Constructed
3.6 Summary
Chapter 4 Factors Affecting Judges’ Construction of PDJ Relationship
4.1 Introduction
4.2 Factors on the Dimension of Procedural Justice
4.2.1 Standing in the Framing Process
4.2.2 Neutrality in the Framing Process
4.2.3 Trust in the Framing Process
4.3 Factors on the Dimension of Distributive Justice
4.3.1 Goals and Motivations in the Framing Process
4.3.2 Individual Factors in the Framing Process
4.3.3 Nonindividual Factors in the Framing Process
4.4 Factors on the Dimension of Retributive Justice
4.4.1 Deserving Punishment in the Framing Process
4.4，2 Criminals Punished in the Framing Process
4.4.3 Punishment Means in the Framing Process
4.4.4 Punishment Severity in the Framing Process
4.5 Summary
Chapter 5 Judges‘ Framing Strategies in Reconstruction of PDJ Relationship
5.1 Introduction
5.2 Footing Shifts by Discourse Information
5.2.1 Categorization of Judges’ Footing Patterns
5.2.2 Judges‘ Footing Shifts
5.3 Reframing with Discourse Information
5.3.1 Frame Contraction
5.3.2 Frame Expansion
5.3.3 Frame Negotiation
5.4 Summary
Chapter 6 Conclusion
6.1 Summary of the Present Study
6.2 Conclusions
6.3 Implications
6.4 Limitations
References
Appendix I General Information on the Cases
Appendix II Figures
Appendix III Tables
Index
Acknowledgements
內容簡介
Abstract
Transcription Conventions
Abbreviations
Chapter I Introduction
1.1 Key Concepts
1.1.1 Discourse
1.1.2 Frame
1.1.3 PDJ Relationship
1.2 Research Background
1.2.1 Judges in the Courtroom Interaction
1.2.2 PDJ Relationship in Courtroom
1.3 Rationale
1.3.1 The Status Quo of Research on the Topic
1.3.2 Frame Analysis as a Practicable Approach
1.4 Research Objective and Questions
1.5 Organization of the Book
Chapter 2 Theoretical Framework
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Theoretical Basis
2.2.1 Frame Theory
2.2.2 Discourse Analysis and Frame Analysis
2.3 Conceptual Framework of Frame Analysis
2.3.1 Interactive Frames Activated by Discourse at Multiple Levels
2.3.2 Application of Framing
2.3.3 Footing Shifts in Frame Analysis
2.4 Analytical Framework
2.5 Research Methodology
2.5.1 Data Collection
2.5.2 Data Analysis
Chapter 3 PDJ Relationship Constructed by Judges in Court
3.1 Introduction
3.2 PDJ Relationship Manifested in Monologue
3.2.1 Monologue in Judges‘ Discourse
3.2.2 PDJ Relationship in the Monologic Interactions
3.3 PDJ Relationship Manifested in Dialogue
3.3.1 Dialogue as Judges’ Directive Information
3.3.2 PDJ Relationship in the Dialogic Interactions
3.4 PDJ Relationship Manifested in Questioning
3.4.1 Questioning in Judges‘ Discourse
3.4.2 PDJ Relationship in the Questioning and Answering
3.5 Results and Discussions
3.5.1 Distribution of Discourse Information
3.5.2 Discourse Information Levels
3.5.3 Current PDJ Relationship Constructed
3.6 Summary
Chapter 4 Factors Affecting Judges’ Construction of PDJ Relationship
4.1 Introduction
4.2 Factors on the Dimension of Procedural Justice
4.2.1 Standing in the Framing Process
4.2.2 Neutrality in the Framing Process
4.2.3 Trust in the Framing Process
4.3 Factors on the Dimension of Distributive Justice
4.3.1 Goals and Motivations in the Framing Process
4.3.2 Individual Factors in the Framing Process
4.3.3 Nonindividual Factors in the Framing Process
4.4 Factors on the Dimension of Retributive Justice
4.4.1 Deserving Punishment in the Framing Process
4.4，2 Criminals Punished in the Framing Process
4.4.3 Punishment Means in the Framing Process
4.4.4 Punishment Severity in the Framing Process
4.5 Summary
Chapter 5 Judges‘ Framing Strategies in Reconstruction of PDJ Relationship
5.1 Introduction
5.2 Footing Shifts by Discourse Information
5.2.1 Categorization of Judges’ Footing Patterns
5.2.2 Judges‘ Footing Shifts
5.3 Reframing with Discourse Information
5.3.1 Frame Contraction
5.3.2 Frame Expansion
5.3.3 Frame Negotiation
5.4 Summary
Chapter 6 Conclusion
6.1 Summary of the Present Study
6.2 Conclusions
6.3 Implications
6.4 Limitations
References
Appendix I General Information on the Cases
Appendix II Figures
Appendix III Tables
Index
