《句法映射理論：格的分配與語能的實現》是2021年重慶大學出版社出版的圖書。
基本介紹
- 書名：句法映射理論：格的分配與語能的實現
- 作者：楊豐榕
- 類別：經濟管理
- 出版社：重慶大學出版社
- 出版時間：2021年
- ISBN：9787568927635
內容簡介,圖書目錄,
內容簡介
本專著由英文寫作，其研究對象為加泰羅尼亞語的句法功能，研究核心在於加泰羅尼亞語中格的分配與語法功能的實現。在對加泰羅尼亞語的基本語言現象進行詳盡描寫的基礎上，本專著探討了運用語言學中的辭彙功能語法對羅曼語族語言進行句法理論解釋的研究範式。
圖書目錄
封面
著作權頁
Acknowledgements
Preface
Contents
1 INTRODUCTION
2 BACKGROUND
2.1 Properties of the sole argument of intransitive verbs
2.1.1 Object properties of the intransitive argument
2.1.2 Subject properties of the intransitive argument
2.1.3 Verbal agreement in intransitive clauses
2.2 Argument realization with passivized verbs
2.2.1 Passive-with-se
2.2.2 Periphrastic passive
2.3 Summary
3 THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
3.1 The general framework
3.1.1 C-structure and f-structure
3.1.2 Inception of argument structure and argument realization
3.1.3 Syntax from an OT-LFG point of view
3.2 Current mapping theories
3.2.1 Lexical Mapping Theories
3.2.1.1 Standard LMT
3.2.1.2 LMT of Kibort-Findlay
3.2.1.3 Problems with the two LMTs
3.2.2 Functional Mapping Theory
3.2.3 Case in LFG
3.3 Summary
4 TOWARDS A NEW MAPPING THEORY
4.1 Argument-to-function mapping theory
4.1.1 The theory
4.1.2 Illustration of the theory
4.2 Subject-object alternation and verb agreement
4.2.1 Constraints on the subject-object alternation
4.2.2 Verb agreement
4.3 Passivization and impersonalization
4.3.1 LFG passivization and Catalan passive constructions
4.3.1.1 Current approaches to passivization in LFG
4.3.1.2 Catalan periphrastic passive
4.3.1.3 Catalan refl exive passive
4.3.2 LFG impersonalization and Catalan impersonal constructions
4.3.2.1 Current approaches to impersonalization in LFG
4.3.2.2 Catalan refl exive impersonal
4.3.2.3 Viability of a unifi ed analysis
4.3.3 Summary and further discussion
4.4 Causative as a complex predicate
4.4.1 Catalan general causative constructions
4.4.2 Refl exivization in complex predicates
4.4.3 Summary
4.5 Summary
5 EXTENSION OF THE STUDY
5.1 Current analyses of expletives
5.2 Analysis of expletive there
5.3 Analysis of propositional expletive it
5.3.1 Against a special propositional mapping principle
5.3.2 Syntactic function of the extraposed clause
5.3.3 Propositional it
5.3.4 Comparison with Kim and Sag (2005)
5.4 Summary
6 CONCLUSIONS
REFERENCES
