Sedition and the Advocacy of Violence

Sedition and the Advocacy of Violence

《Sedition and the Advocacy of Violence》是2011年出版的圖書,作者是Sorial,Sarah。

基本介紹

  • 外文名:Sedition and the Advocacy of Violence
  • 作者:Sorial, Sarah
  • 出版時間:2011年10月
  • 頁數:216 頁
  • ISBN:9780415565158
  • 定價:141.25 美元
內容簡介
This book employs the theoretical framework of 'speech act theory' to analyse current legislative frameworks and cases pertaining to sedition or the advocacy of violence and the issue of freedom of speech. An analysis of the relation between speech and action offers a promising way of clarifying confusion over the contested status of speech, which advocates violence as a political strategy. This account reflects an understanding of philosophical issues about both the nature of freedom and speech and how these issues can be applied to concrete legal problems. This approach will shed new light on the problems of the sedition laws and how they might be remedied by providing a conceptual account of the nature of speech and its relation to action. On the basis of J.L Austin's account of verdictive and exercitive speech acts, it is argued that while all speech acts are 'conduct' in a narrow sense, not all of them have the power to produce effects. This philosophical account will have legal consequences for how we classify speech acts deemed to be dangerous, or to cause harm. It also suggests that because speech can evoke or constitute action or conduct in certain circumstances, modern versions of sedition laws might in principle be defensible, but not in their current form. On the basis of this account, it is argued that the harms caused or constituted by speech can be located in the authority of the speaker. Sedition and Violence Against the State: Free Speech and Counter-Terrorism will be of interest to students and scholars of philosophy of law and legal theory.
Sedition and the Advocacy of Violence
騷亂和暴力的宣傳
這本書採用“言語行為理論”的理論框架來分析當前的立法框架和煽動或暴力的宣傳和言論自由的問題。言論和行動之間的關係的分析提供了一個有前途的方式澄清混亂在演講的競爭地位,主張暴力作為一種政治策略。這個帳戶反映了哲學的理解問題的本質和言論自由和這些問題如何適用於具體的法律問題。這種方法將揭示問題的煽動法律和如何彌補他們通過提供一個概念性的賬戶性質的言論和行動的關係。根據J。L奧斯汀的verdictive exercitive言語行為,它認為,雖然言語行為都是“行為”在狹義上,並不是所有人有能力產生影響。這種哲學帳戶將合法的缺點。

熱門詞條

聯絡我們